To quote the old slogan, “You’ve come a long way baby!” Although originally started as an animal organization, the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) has moved a long way from its initial goal of animal welfare to its current animal rights consistent stance.
This positional shift towards an animal rights approach began with the 1980 HSUS convention call for “pursuit on all fronts… the clear articulation and establishment of the rights of animals”.1 In 1986, former HSUS director of laboratory welfare John McArdle was quoted as observing “HSUS is definitely shifting in the direction of animal rights faster than anyone would realize from our literature”.2 Interestingly, John McArdle was fired from his position with the HSUS shortly after this statement, allegedly for being ‘an animal rights activist, despite a similar observation made in 1986 by HSUS president-emeritus John Hoyt, “This new philosophy [animal rights] has served as a catalyst in the shaping of out own philosophies, policies and goals”.3 Being HSUS president-emeritus, John Hoyt was not in a position over which the HSUS could exert leverage.
This philosophical shift continued through the 1990s through former PETA employees joining the HSUS, such Cristobel “Kitty” Block and members of other animal rights organizations such as Wayne Pacelle, lauded in 1997 as “one of America’s most important animal rights activists”, formerly of Friends of Animals and Fund for Animals.12,13
· Ms Block has been promoted from her previous position as an HSUS investigator (starting prior to 1995) to the position of Vice President of Humane Society International (HSI), the international arm of HSUS and is currently responsible for many of the HSI campaigns and legal challenges are led by HSI.9,10,11
· Wayne Pacelle, who joined the HSUS in 1994, has risen from chief lobbyist and spokesperson to President and CEO.
Support for the animal rights position was further exhibited by HSUS’ significant participation in the 1997 Animal Rights National Convention with HSUS speakers including:
· Martin Stephens: then and current Vice-President of Animal Research Issues 4, 5
· Patricia Forkan: then Executive Vice President, current Senior Vice President & International President, Humane Society International 4, 5
· John Lyman: then director of Eating with a Conscience campaign 4
· Michael Fox: then Vice President of Bioethics and Farm Protection and current member of Association of Veterinarians for Animal Rights4,6
The inclusion of animal rights activists into the HSUS executive continued with the hiring in 2000 of John “JP” Goodwin. Mr. Goodwin is currently Manager, Animal Fighting Issues and formerly of the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) and founder of the Coalition to Abolish the Fur Trade (CAFT). 5,7,8
Despite the progressive incorporation of Animal Rights Activism into the HSUS, there continues to be significant activity to curtail public awareness of this information:
- Through referring to Animal Rights philosophy as Animal Advocacy
- Through members of the executive changing their referenced first names as in the cases of Cristobel Block, now referred to as Kitty Block, and JP Goodwin, now referred to as John Goodwin. These minor changes make it more difficult to hold these members of the executive accountable for their controversial former affiliations
- Through the manipulation of public information as demonstrated by the continual removal of unfavorable information from the HSUS Wikipedia page, which has a long history of extremely close monitoring by a small number of individuals.
All of this combines to throw a veil of doubt over intentions of the HSUS, as the sheep’s clothing throws a veil of doubt over the intentions of the wolf.14,15
Copyright 2009 by Erica Saunders
All rights reserved
References
- HSUS, Animal Rights and Human Obligations, 1981 publication, as cited in The Humane Society in the US: Its Not about Animal Shelters, Daniel Oliver
- John McArdle, quoted in Katie McCabe, “Who Will Live, Who Will Die,” Washingtonian August 1986, p115, as cited in The Humane Society in the US: Its Not about Animal Shelters, Daniel Oliver
- John Hoyt, quoted in Katie McCabe, “Katie McCabe Replies,” Washingtonian October 1986, pp109-110, as cited in The Humane Society in the US: Its Not about Animal Shelters, Daniel Oliver
- The Humane Society in the US: Its Not about Animal Shelters, Daniel Oliver http://saova.org/articles/HSUS_ItsNotAboutAnimalShelters-Oliver.pdf
- The Humane Society of the United States website, 2009 http://www.hsus.org/about_us/board_and_staff/experts/
- Self-disclosed biographical information, Michael Fox, http://tedeboy.tripod.com/drmichaelwfox/id1.html
- New York Times article, Anti-Fur Groups Wage War on Mink Farms, http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C04E6D8153CF933A05752C1A960958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=2
- No Compromise article, Fur Wars Heat Up: A.L.F. is on the Warpath! , JP Goodwin, http://www.nocompromise.org/issues/04furwar.html
- http://www.animalpeoplenews.org/04/7-8/7.04.swf
- http://www.hsus.org/about_us/board_and_staff/experts/experts/kitty_block.html
- http://www.pewwhales.org/whalesymposium/agenda.php
- http://www.humaneusa.org/humaneusaboard.htm#Pacelle
- http://friendsofanimals.org/
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Humane_Society_of_the_United_States&action=history
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Humane_Society_of_the_United_States
Tags: Animal Rights, Challenges, HSUS, Humane Society, Legislation, PETA, Property Rights
What's the difference in vernacular? The issue is humane treatment of animals. NO ONE, including HSUS, is pushing for animals to drive, drink, or vote. Duh! All animals are vulnerable to humans, and HSUS, along with every animal welfare and rights activist (and those who just sit on the couch and hope for a better world), simply wants them to be protected from the twisted ways of humankind. Don't we owe them that? Or do you think you "God" put them here for you to use and mis-use?
Animal rights, animal welfare, it's all the same to me. Animals should not be subject to human torture, regardless of their ultimate purpose. Why do you want to ingest meat from an animal who had no real life, who existed in pain and terror before it hit your digestive system?
Discussions like this detract from the real issues of animal injustice and human ignorance. Don't believe me? Here's yet another recent example of a judge without a clue or heart: http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/metro/article_...
Looks like no one who agrees with you has posted anything, and you have obviously not allowed anyone else to comment. Real democratic of you.
Free speech is a scary thing, when you speak with forked tongue, huh? Afraid to air the other side?
Speech on private websites is not 'free speech' but subject to the whims of any particular website owner. You have obviously not investigated the website to any degree or you would realize that I typically approve comments pretty freely.
If you would like to kick sand in your own sandbox, feel free. But this is my sandbox and everyone's ability to play in it is purely at my own discretion.